In today’s world of innovation, patents play a crucial role in protecting new inventions. However, sometimes a granted patent may not be as strong as it appears. The patent may have been issued even if the invention covered may not be as new or inventive as initially thought and that’s where an invalidity search becomes relevant.
An invalidity search is a legal and technical method used to contest the validity of an issued patent. By identifying prior art (existing patents/patent applications, publications, or other sources in the public domain) that predates the patent’s filing date, this search helps demonstrate that the patent is either not novel or obvious—two key criteria for obtaining a patent. Now, we will break this down and explain why it’s important, and how it works in simple terms.
Invalidity Search-Meaning
An invalidity search involves finding evidence that can invalidate a granted patent. Essentially, it’s a process of searching through existing knowledge—whether in the form of other patents, scientific articles, or other public sources—to determine if a specific patent was correctly issued.
For a patent to be granted to an invention, it must meet the three criteria mentioned below:
- Novelty: The invention must be new and not previously disclosed.
- Non-obviousness: The invention must not be obvious to someone with ordinary skill in the art.
- Utility: The invention must be useful and should have industrial utility and applicability.
If prior art (documents or inventions) already exists that proves the invention was known or obvious before the patent was filed, the patent may not meet these criteria, may make it invalid.
Significance Of An Invalidity Search
A search for invalidity is essential for several reasons, especially in the world of patent litigation, intellectual property management, and business strategy. Conducting a search for invalidity is highly beneficial and crucial in the following scenarios:
- Patent Litigation: In patent litigation, an invalidity search is a strategic tool for both defendants and patentees, though used from opposing standpoints.
- For the defendant, it serves as a key defense mechanism. Identifying prior art that predates or undermines the asserted patent can help invalidate the claim, avoid liability, reduce litigation costs, or support a counterclaim.
- For the patentee, anticipating such challenges is essential. A proactive review of prior art strengthens their position, helps prepare for validity attacks, and reinforces the enforceability of their intellectual property rights.
In essence, an invalidity search is not just a defensive tactic but a critical factor shaping the litigation strategy on both sides.
When a company is accused of infringing a patent, a key defense strategy is challenging the validity of the patent. Demonstrating the invalidity of the patent can help the company avoid expensive lawsuits and potential financial penalties or file a counter claim.
- Patent Opposition: In many countries, individuals or companies can formally oppose a patent application or a granted patent. An invalidity search helps gather the necessary evidence to support this opposition.
- Competitive Intelligence: Companies often conduct invalidity searches to assess whether their competitors’ patents might be vulnerable, such an invalidation search creates opportunities for market competition or innovation.
- Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): When one company is acquiring another, generally an invalidity search is conducted as it is a valuable tool to assess the strength of the target company’s patent portfolio before the deal is finalized.
- Investor Confidence: Investors want to be sure that a company’s patents are legitimate and not vulnerable to being invalidated. A thorough invalidity search provides this assurance.
Process Steps Of The Search For Invalidity:
The search is conducted through several steps, and it requires technical knowledge, expertise in patent law, and access to various patent and literature databases. A summary of key-points about how the invalidation search works is defined below:
A. Understand The Patent Being Challenged
The first step is to understand the challenged patent claims and the claims of the patent that set the boundary of the invention claimed and determine the extent of the protection granted by the patent. This search focuses on the claims, and their description, as to what the patent covers. In some cases, only specific claims of the patent may need to be invalidated, not the entire patent.
B. Determining The Parameters For The Invalidity Search
The searcher decides the boundary or the scope of the search. The main goal is to identify documents that were publicly accessible prior to the patent’s filing date. The prior art searched can include:
- Patents: Any patents published before the date of filing of the challenged patent.
- Non-patent literature: This includes research papers, books, conference proceedings, product manuals, and online articles.
- Products or services: In some cases, publicly available products or services may be considered prior art if they were available before the patent’s filing.
The search is global, meaning it considers patents and publications from all around the world.
C. Search Tools And Databases
The search is performed using specialized tools and databases, including:
- Patent Databases: Free databases such as Google Patents, Espacenet, and USPTO offer access to global patent documents. The paid databases such as Questel Orbit and Patbase that also offer access to global patent documents.
- Non-Patent Literature Databases: The platforms used for non-patent literature are Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed provide access to academic and technical papers.
- Search Engines: Even general search engines like Google can sometimes reveal prior art that isn’t in formal patent or academic databases.
Patent searchers use sophisticated techniques, such as various Boolean operators such as (AND, OR, NOT), to refine search results and pinpoint the most relevant prior art.
D. Analyse The Results
After identifying relevant prior art, it is compared with the challenged patent to assess similarities. The analysis focuses on the following key factors:
- Novelty: Does the prior art reveal the identical invention? If so, the patent is deemed anticipated and could be invalid.
- Obviousness: If the prior art does not disclose the invention exactly but makes it obvious to someone skilled in the field, then the patent could still be invalid. This judgment requires understanding the state of the art at the time of the invention.
E. Compile An Invalidation Search Report
Once all relevant prior art has been gathered and analysed, a search report is created. The complied invalidation search report includes:
- A list of prior art references.
- A thorough explanation of how each reference pertains to the disputed patent claims.
- An assessment of the likelihood that the patent in question, might be invalidated based on the findings.
Challenges In An Invalidity Search
While the search of invalidity is a powerful tool, it comes with its challenges:
A. Volume Of Information
- Millions of patents exist globally, and new ones are published regularly.
- Prior art isn’t limited to patents—it includes scientific papers, books, product manuals, websites, YouTube videos, conference presentations, and even public uses of inventions.
- Much of the prior art exists in unstructured formats, making it difficult to search efficiently
What this means:
Searching and analysing the most relevant and impactful prior art is like searching for a needle in a haystack. It requires advanced search techniques, specialized tools, and a lot of patience.
B. Complexity Of The Invention
Assessing novelty or obviousness is not black and white. It involves:
- Understanding the technical field.
- Interpreting patent claims accurately (which are often written in complex legal-technical language).
- Making judgments about whether an expert in the field would find the invention “obvious” based on the existing prior art.
- In emerging fields like AI, biotechnology, or electronics, the technical depth can be immense.
What this means:
You often need a cross-disciplinary team—patent attorneys, engineers, scientists, researchers—to interpret the invention and analyse the relevance of the state of the art.
C. Global Nature Of Patents
Patents are filed and enforced across many countries, each with its own legal system, languages, and databases.
Why it’s challenging:
- Prior art might be found in non-English languages or under different naming conventions in foreign jurisdictions.
- Due to differing legal standards and procedural requirements across jurisdictions, a document deemed valid prior art in one country may not meet the criteria in another.
- The patent filing systems differ (e.g., USPTO of the USA, EPO of Europe, JPO in Japan, CNIPA in China), and searching across these systems is not always straightforward.
- Some countries publish patents in native languages only or delay publication, making them harder to access.
What this means:
To do a truly global invalidity search, one needs:
- Access to international databases for patent and related translation tools.
- Knowledge of local patent laws.
- Awareness of regional innovation trends, which may affect where and how prior art might be disclosed.
Opportunities For An Invalidator:
A. Avoiding Legal Liability
Opportunity: An invalidity search can help counter a patent infringement claim by proving the patent was improperly granted.
- How it helps: If you prove that the patent is invalid, you can walk away without paying damages, licensing fees, or changing your product.
- Strategic benefit: It turns a legal threat into an opportunity to clear your path forward.
B. Weakening A Competitor’s Patent Portfolio
Opportunity: By invalidating a patent of a competitor, you reduce the strength of their intellectual property arsenal.
- How it helps: Weak or invalidated patents can no longer be used to block your products or innovations.
- Strategic benefit: This can open up markets, reduce a rival’s valuation, or stop them from asserting dominance.
C. Gaining Leverage In Negotiations
Opportunity: If you’re negotiating a license, partnership, or acquisition, discovering that the patent is vulnerable gives you bargaining power.
- How it helps: You may negotiate lower royalties or even refuse a deal, if the patent is weak.
- Strategic benefit: It shifts the balance of power in your favour.
D. Guiding Research And Development (R&D) And Product Development
Opportunity: Finding flaws in existing patents helps you understand what has already been done, and where your innovation space lies.
- How it helps: You can design products that avoid infringement or develop better versions of existing technologies.
- Strategic benefit: Helps your company innovate smarter and safer.
E. Improving Investment And Acquisition Decisions
Opportunity: Before investing in or acquiring a company, use an invalidity search to verify the real value of its patents.
- How it helps: If key patents are weak, the company may not be worth what it’s claiming.
- Strategic benefit: Allows you to negotiate a better deal or avoid a bad investment.
F. Exposing Overreaching Patents
Opportunity: Some patent holders try to claim rights over things they didn’t really invent. A search for invalidity can expose these overbroad or aggressive claims.
- How it helps: Stops patent trolling and reduces barriers to innovation.
- Strategic benefit: You protect not only your own business but the innovation ecosystem in your industry.
G. Filing Oppositions Or Re-Examinations
Opportunity: In many jurisdictions, you can formally challenge a patent through post-grant opposition or re-examination.
- How it helps: Invalidating a patent through these channels can have legal weight across multiple countries.
- Strategic benefit: You eliminate threats before they become lawsuits.
Conclusion
An invalidity search involves identifying prior art or other information that could show a patent was granted in error. It is an important and critical process that ensures patents are awarded only for truly innovative and novel inventions. Whether used to defend against patent infringement lawsuits or challenge a competitor’s patent, invalidity searches help preserving the reliability of the patent system.
Through detailed analysis of patent claims and prior art, an invalidity search can render a patent unenforceable by proving it lacks validity. In an era of rapid technological advancement, such searches are crucial for maintaining a robust intellectual property framework.
Need Assistance With Patent Analytics/Patent Search?
At R.K. Dewan & Co., we believe that your ideas deserve the strongest protection, not just in the marketplace, but in the legal landscape as well. With a legacy of over 80 years in Intellectual Property (IP) law, we offer end-to-end IP solutions tailored to support innovators, start-ups, growing businesses, and multinational corporations alike.
Our team of experienced patent and trademark attorneys, advocates and techno-legal experts at R.K. Dewan & Co. is ready to assist you at every stage of your journey towards the pursuit of intellectual property (IP). We offer comprehensive infringement analysis to help you assess the risk of infringing third-party patents before launching your product/process.
At R.K. Dewan & Co., we offer a comprehensive range of patent search, patent drafting and prosecution to support innovation, protect your intellectual property, and guide strategic decision-making. Our offerings include freedom-to-operate (FTO) searches to identify potential patent obstacles before entering the market, and patentability searches to determine if your invention meets the criteria of novelty and inventive step prior to filing. We also conduct invalidity and opposition searches to assess the strength of existing patents and support litigation or defense strategies. Our state-of-the-art landscape and white space analysis help uncover emerging technologies, research and development (R&D) opportunities, and areas for competitive advantage. Beyond patent searches, we provide trademark search and registration services to secure your brand identity globally, as well as copyright protection for your creative, digital, and design assets. In cases of intellectual property (IP) disputes, our team offers reliable support in enforcement and litigation, including infringement assessments and oppositions. We also specialize in intellectual property (IP) portfolio management, delivering strategic guidance to help you maintain, protect, as well as maximize the value of your intellectual property. Whether you are developing a new product, evaluating your intellectual property (IP) position, or entering a new market, we equip you with the insight and tools needed to move forward with confidence.