Innovation does not happen in isolation; it is a battleground where ideas clash, rivalries ignite, and the pursuit of ownership shapes the future. Behind the technologies we rely on every day lie stories of groundbreaking discoveries entangled in fierce legal disputes, where patents have been both catalysts for progress and obstacles to competition.
But how much do we really know about the battles that define the modern world? Welcome to “Patent Feuds: The Untold Battle That Shaped Innovation,” a deep dive into the untold stories of ambition, controversy, and the relentless fight for technological dominance. In this series, we will explore the rivalries that shaped industries, the inventions that sparked legal firestorms, and the lasting impact of Intellectual Property on the world as we know it. Get ready to uncover the drama, the stakes, and the ideas that changed world history.
A Shocking Rivalry That Changed the World
Imagine a time when streets were lit by gas lamps, and electric light was a luxury few could dream of. Now picture two of the most powerful minds of the 19th century, Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse, locked in a fierce battle, not just to power homes, but to own the future of electricity.
This was not ordinary rivalry. It was a war fought with patents, propaganda, and power literally. On one side stood Edison, championing Direct Current (DC). On the other side was Westinghouse, a bold entrepreneur backing Alternating Current (AC). Together, their patent feud sparked what history now calls the War of Currents.
Let’s dive into this electrifying tale of invention, competition, and innovation.
The Spark of Invention: How Electricity Came to Life
In the 1870s, electricity was the new kid on the block, promising to revolutionize how people lived. Thomas Edison, the “Wizard of Menlo Park,” was already a celebrity for inventing the phonograph. In 1879, he turned his genius to lighting, patenting the first commercially viable incandescent light bulb under U.S. Patent No. 223,898 (filed 1879, granted 1880). His bulb was not the first of its kind; others had played with glowing filaments, but Edison’s design was practical, affordable, and ready to light up homes. To power it, he championed direct current (DC), a system where electricity flows in one direction, like water through a pipe. DC was safe for small-scale use but had a big flaw: it could not travel far without losing power. This meant power plants had to be built every mile or so, which was expensive and limiting.
We do not claim any copyright in the above image. The same has been reproduced for academic and representational purposes only.
Enter George Westinghouse: A New Kind of Current
A Pittsburgh engineer with a knack for big ideas. Westinghouse had made his fortune with the railway air brake, but in 1885, he read about alternating current (AC) in a British journal. Unlike DC, AC could be “stepped up” to high voltages for long-distance transmission, then “stepped down” for safe use in homes, thanks to transformers.
We do not claim any copyright in the above image. The same has been reproduced for academic and representational purposes only.
Westinghouse saw the future and bought the American rights to a transformer patented by Lucien Gaulard and John Gibbs (U.S. Patent No. 351,589, filed 1886). He also hired Nikola Tesla, a brilliant Serbian inventor, and acquired Tesla’s patents for an AC polyphase motor (U.S. Patent No. 381,968, filed 1887, granted 1888). This motor made AC practical for powering machinery, giving Westinghouse a game-changing edge.
We do not claim any copyright in the above image. The same has been reproduced for academic and representational purposes only.
Who Invented What First?
The question of “who invented first” is tricky. Edison’s incandescent bulb (Patent No. 223,898) came before Westinghouse’s AC system, but lighting was not the whole story. The real fight was over how to deliver electricity. Edison’s DC system was the first to market, powering New York City’s first power plant in 1882. However, AC’s roots trace back to European inventors like Gaulard and Gibbs, whose transformer work predated Westinghouse’s involvement. Tesla’s polyphase AC motor, patented in 1888, was a breakthrough, but it built on earlier AC concepts. So, while Edison was first to commercialize a full DC system, Westinghouse and Tesla made AC viable for widespread use. Both sides held critical patents, setting the stage for a legal showdown.
The Feud Heats Up: Propaganda, Patents, and Public Fear
Edison saw AC as a direct threat not just to his business, but to public safety. In 1888, his company, Edison Electric Light Company, claimed AC was dangerous and infringed on their patents, particularly those covering incandescent lighting and power distribution (e.g., U.S. Patent No. 369,280, filed 1887, for DC distribution). He launched a full-scale smear campaign, claiming AC was too dangerous for public use. His team went as far as electrocuting animals in public using AC to prove its danger. In a dark twist, Edison even helped develop the first electric chair, powered by AC, to link the technology to death.
We do not claim any copyright in the above image. The same has been reproduced for academic and representational purposes only.
Westinghouse was outraged. He believed AC was not only safe when properly handled but essential for national electrification. His company continued improving Tesla’s inventions and licensing key AC system patents, despite Edison’s attempts to block them.
Behind the scenes, patent lawsuits ensued. Edison’s company (Edison Electric Light Company) accused Westinghouse of infringing on lamp and generator patents. Westinghouse fired back, defending his right to use the Tesla AC system. At the heart of the feud was not just the flow of current, but control over a multi-million-dollar industry.
How Westinghouse Won in Court
Edison sued Westinghouse, claiming AC systems violated his patents, like U.S. Patent No. 223,898 (bulb) and U.S. Patent No. 369,280 (DC distribution). Westinghouse countered with Tesla’s AC motor patent (U.S. Patent No. 381,968) and transformer patent (U.S. Patent No. 351,589), arguing AC was a unique technology. Courts agreed, ruling Tesla’s AC system did not infringe Edison’s DC patents. Westinghouse also challenged Edison’s bulb patent, citing earlier inventions. By 1896, Edison’s patent was expiring, and a patent-sharing deal ended the lawsuits. Westinghouse’s legal wins helped AC become the standard.
Technical Significance: Why AC Beats DC
Despite Edison’s efforts, AC had several clear advantages:
Long-Distance Power Transmission: AC systems could transmit power miles away using step-up and step-down transformers. Scalability: One central power plant could serve a wide area more cheaply and efficiently. Efficient Distribution: AC wires could carry more power with less loss.
Edison’s DC system required building many small power plants close to consumers, a costly, limited solution.
The turning point came in 1893 when Westinghouse won the contract to power the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago. Using Tesla’s AC system, Westinghouse illuminated over 100,000 incandescent lamps, proving AC’s safety and effectiveness to millions.
That same year, Westinghouse also secured the project to build the first large-scale hydroelectric power station at Niagara Falls, again using AC.
We do not claim any copyright in the above image. The same has been reproduced for academic and representational purposes only
The Feud Ends: Merger, Money, and the Future
In 1892, Edison’s DC-based company was merged with its AC-leaning rival, Thomson-Houston Electric Company, to form General Electric (GE). Despite Edison’s personal resistance, the newly formed GE adopted AC technologies to stay competitive.
Though Edison lost the current war, his impact on invention and entrepreneurship remains historic. Westinghouse, on the other hand, secured his legacy as the man who electrified America.
Tesla, often overlooked at the time, was later celebrated as the genius behind the AC system that powers our modern lives.
Because of this feud, it led to a historical difference in the voltage supply across various countries. Wherever the British went, the utility supplies were set at 220V AC, which offers greater efficiency for long-distance power transmission. On the other hand, Edison’s belief that AC was dangerous led to utility supplies in the U.S. being set at 120V DC. As a result, even today, to use a U.S. appliance in India, you need to step down 220V to 120V or even 110V.
Conclusion: Lessons for Modern Inventors
The War of Currents was not just a clash of egos; it was a lesson in how innovation, patents, and competition shape the world. For today’s inventors, the story of Edison and Westinghouse offers key takeaways. First, protect your ideas with patents, but be ready to adapt. Edison’s stubbornness cost him control of his company. Second, technical superiority often wins, but public perception matters too; Westinghouse’s focus on AC’s merits outshone Edison’s smear tactics. Finally, collaboration can outlast conflict. The patent-sharing deal showed that even bitter rivals could find common ground.
In the end, it is not just the currents that shape our world, but the courage to flow against them.
With over 79 years of expertise in Intellectual Property law, R K Dewan & Co. is a trusted name in patent litigation in India, offering end-to-end legal solutions to domestic and international clients. Our ISO 9001:2015 certified firm is equipped with a team of 175+ experienced IP professionals who specialize in handling complex patent disputes, infringement actions, and enforcement proceedings across all judicial tiers. From defending high-stakes innovations to enforcing patent rights against unauthorized use, RKD provides strategic counsel backed by decades of courtroom and commercial experience. Whether you’re navigating contentious litigation, seeking injunctive relief, or protecting your patent portfolio, R K Dewan & Co. ensures robust representation and tailored strategies to safeguard your innovations in India and globally.